Informations générales (source: ClinicalTrials.gov)
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Multicenter Trial Comparing Electronic Cigarettes With Nicotine to Varenicline and to Electronic Cigarettes Without Nicotine.
Interventional
Phase 3
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Voir sur ClinicalTrials)
octobre 2018
mars 2022
03 décembre 2025
Background:
Electronic cigarettes (EC) mainly containing nicotine (88-95 % of users) are widely and
growingly used worldwide. It is estimated that there were 1.7 million daily users in
France in 2016. Although the number of publications about its use is increasing
exponentially, there are no evidence based, unbiased, head-to-head comparison data about
its efficacy as an aid to smoking cessation. As of today, only two head-to-head
randomized studies have been published, both reported negative results at the main
endpoint but they used first and second generation EC delivering nicotine with low or
unknown bioavailability. Recent EC deliver nicotine with largely improved
bioavailability.
One of the randomized studies compared EC with and without nicotine to nicotine patch and
reported similar smoking cessation rate at main outcome. However, there is no published,
double blind study comparing EC use with a well-studied, licensed smoking cessation
medication.
Superiority of EC with nicotine compared to EC without nicotine and to a reference
smoking cessation medication while collecting also straightforward information about
safety, would allow proposing EC with nicotine to the large population of smokers who
intend to quit and situate it among the approved smoking cessation treatments.
The clinical study's hypothesis:
EC containing nicotine can be considered as a nicotine replacement therapy having,
probably, a better bioavailability of nicotine than the marketed pharmaceutical NRTs,
first line medications of smoking cessation. It is therefore of interest to compare EC
containing nicotine to EC without nicotine but also to a reference medication with
demonstrated efficacy in smoking cessation. We hypothesize that EC with nicotine provides
a higher smoking abstinence rate than EC without nicotine and may be as good as
varenicline, our reference medication.
Etablissements
| Les établissements d'Île-de-France ayant mis à jour leurs données Origine et niveau de fiabilité des données | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP-HP Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | 13/12/2025 07:49:04 | Contacter | |||
| AP-HP - Hôpital Antoine Béclère | |||||
| AP-HP - Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière | |||||
| AP-HP - Hôpital Paul Brousse | |||||
| AP-HP - Hôpital Tenon | |||||
| Les établissements sans correspondance certaine dans le répertoire FINESS dont les données sont issues de ClinicalTrials.gov Origine et niveau de fiabilité des données | |||||
| 29/11/2025 08:05:47 | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | ||||
Critères
Tous
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Smokers smoking at least 10 cigarettes/day (factory made or roll-your-own) in the
past year
2. Aged 18 to 70 years
3. Motivated to quit defined as a score > 5 on a visual rating scale ranging from 0
(not motivated at all) to 10 (extremely motivated)
4. Signed written informed consent
5. Understanding and speaking French
6. Women of childbearing age can be included if they use an effective contraceptive
method: either hormonal contraception or an intrauterine device started at least one
month before the first research visit
7. Individual affiliated to a health insurance system as defined by the sponsor (except
Aide Médicale d'État =AME)
8. Previous failure of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
1. Smokers smoking at least 10 cigarettes/day (factory made or roll-your-own) in the
past year
2. Aged 18 to 70 years
3. Motivated to quit defined as a score > 5 on a visual rating scale ranging from 0
(not motivated at all) to 10 (extremely motivated)
4. Signed written informed consent
5. Understanding and speaking French
6. Women of childbearing age can be included if they use an effective contraceptive
method: either hormonal contraception or an intrauterine device started at least one
month before the first research visit
7. Individual affiliated to a health insurance system as defined by the sponsor (except
Aide Médicale d'État =AME)
8. Previous failure of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
1. any unstable disease condition within the last 3 months defined by the investigator
as major change in symptoms or treatments such as 1.1.recent myocardial infarction,
1.2.unstable or worsening angina 1.3.severe cardiac arrhythmia 1.4.unstable or
uncontrolled arterial hypertension 1.5.recent stroke 1.6.cerebrovascular disease
1.7.obliterative peripheral arterial disease 1.8.cardiac insufficiency 1.9.diabetes
1.10.hyperthyroidism 1.11.pheochromocytoma 1.12.severe hepatic insufficiency
1.13.history of seizures 1.14.severe depression 1.15.chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD)
2. any life threatening condition with life-expectancy of less than 3 months
3. alcohol use disorder defined as a score ≥ 10 on the AUDIT-C questionnaire
4. abuse of or dependence on illegal drugs in the last 6 months revealed by the medical
history
5. regular use of tobacco products other than cigarettes
6. current or previous (last 6 months) use of electronic cigarette
7. pregnant women
8. breastfeeding women
9. protected adults
10. current or past 3 months participation in another interventional research
11. current or past (last 3 months) use of smoking cessation medication such as
varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapies
12. known lactose intolerance (placebo tablets contain lactose)
13. hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
14. known severe renal failure