Informations générales (source: ClinicalTrials.gov)
Glucocorticoids Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial (EXAFIP2)
Interventional
Phase 3
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph (Voir sur ClinicalTrials)
octobre 2023
décembre 2026
29 juin 2024
Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is associated with a poor
prognosis, with a 3-month mortality rate of over 50%. To date, no treatment has been
proven to be effective in AI-FPI. The interest of glucocorticoids is controversial and
needs to be confirmed. This confirmation is mandatory to validate the improvement of the
prognosis of EA-IPF under this treatment but also to search for unsuspected deleterious
effects as it has been shown with immunosuppressants in stable idiopathic pulmonary
fibrosis.
Etablissements
Les établissements d'Île-de-France ayant mis à jour leurs données Origine et niveau de fiabilité des données | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP-HP - Hôpital Avicenne | ALEXANDRE CHABROL | 30/12/2024 08:02:34 | Contacter | ||
CHI DE CRETEIL | Quentin GIBIOT | 29/03/2024 01:30:41 | Contacter | ||
Les établissements d'Île-de-France dont les données sont issues de ClinicalTrials.gov Origine et niveau de fiabilité des données | |||||
AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat | Bruno CRESTANI, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
AP-HP - Hôpital Europeen Georges Pompidou | Jean PASTRE, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
AP-HP - Hôpital Tenon | Jacques CADRANEL, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
GH PARIS SITE SAINT JOSEPH | Jean-Marc NACCACHE, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
Les établissements sans correspondance certaine dans le répertoire FINESS dont les données sont issues de ClinicalTrials.gov Origine et niveau de fiabilité des données | |||||
CHIC - Créteil - France | Quentin GIBIOT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHRU Lille - Lille - France | Victor VALENTIN, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU ANgers - Angers - France | Frederic GAGNADOUX | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU BOrdeaux - Bordeaux - France | Elodie BLANCHARD, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Caen - Caen - France | Emmanuel BERGOT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Clermont-Ferrand - Clermont-Ferrand - France | Camille ROLLAND DEBORD, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU de Besancon - Besançon - France | Mathilde DUPREZ, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU de Dijon - Dijon - France | Philippe BONNIAUD, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU de Montpellier - Montpellier - France | Arnaud BOURDIN, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU de Nantes - Nantes - France | Stéphanie DIROU, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Grenoble - Grenoble - France | Sebastien QUETANT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Nancy - Nancy - France | Anne GUILLAUMOT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Nice - Nice - France | Sylvie LEROY, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Reims - Reims - France | Francois LEBARGY, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Rennes - Rennes - France | Stephane JOUNEAU, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Rouen - Rouen - France | Stéphane DOMINIQUE, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Strasbourg - Strasbourg - France | Sandrine HIRSCHI, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Toulouse - Toulouse - France | Gregoire PREVOT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
CHU Tours - Tours - France | Thomas FLAMENT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
Hôpital FOCH - Paris - France | Alexandre CHABROL, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
Hôpital Nord - Marseille - France | Martine REAYNAUD GAUBERT, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
Hôpital Saint-Louis - Paris - France | Abdellatif TAZI, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) | |||
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Lyon - France | Vincent COTTIN, MD | Contact (sur clinicalTrials) |
Critères
Tous
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
2. IPF or IPF (likely) diagnosis defined on 2018 international recommendations
3. Definite or suspected Acute Exacerbation defined by the international working group
criteria after exclusion of alternative diagnoses of acute worsening
*The criteria of IPF-AE are as follows:
- Previous or concurrent diagnosis of IPF (a)
- Acute worsening or development of dyspnea typically < 1-month duration
- Computed tomography with new bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or
consolidation superimposed on a background pattern consistent with usual
interstitial pneumonia pattern (b)
- Deterioration not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload Patients
who fail to meet all 4 criteria due to missing computed tomography should be
considered as having "suspected Acute Exacerbation".
1. If the diagnosis of IPF is not previously established, this criterion can
be met by the presence of radiologic and/or histopathologic changes
consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the current
evaluation.
2. If no previous computed tomography is available, the qualifier "new" can
be dropped from the third criterion.
4. For women of childbearing age: efficient contraception for the duration of the
study*
*Effective contraception is defined as any contraceptive method that is used
consistently and appropriately and has a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per
year)
5. Affiliation to the social security
6. Patient able to understand and sign a written informed consent form or in case of
incapacity of the patient to a relative whom understand and sign a written informed
consent form
1. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
2. IPF or IPF (likely) diagnosis defined on 2018 international recommendations
3. Definite or suspected Acute Exacerbation defined by the international working group
criteria after exclusion of alternative diagnoses of acute worsening
*The criteria of IPF-AE are as follows:
- Previous or concurrent diagnosis of IPF (a)
- Acute worsening or development of dyspnea typically < 1-month duration
- Computed tomography with new bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or
consolidation superimposed on a background pattern consistent with usual
interstitial pneumonia pattern (b)
- Deterioration not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload Patients
who fail to meet all 4 criteria due to missing computed tomography should be
considered as having "suspected Acute Exacerbation".
1. If the diagnosis of IPF is not previously established, this criterion can
be met by the presence of radiologic and/or histopathologic changes
consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the current
evaluation.
2. If no previous computed tomography is available, the qualifier "new" can
be dropped from the third criterion.
4. For women of childbearing age: efficient contraception for the duration of the
study*
*Effective contraception is defined as any contraceptive method that is used
consistently and appropriately and has a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per
year)
5. Affiliation to the social security
6. Patient able to understand and sign a written informed consent form or in case of
incapacity of the patient to a relative whom understand and sign a written informed
consent form
1. Identified etiology for acute worsening (i.e.: infectious disease)
2. Known hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids or to any component of the study treatment
3. Patient requiring mechanical ventilation or already on mechanical ventilation
4. Active bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitic infection. On swab collected, only
positive for SARS-CoV-2, Influenzae A, Influenzae B and Respiratory Syncytial Virus
(RSV) result, are considered active viral infection. The others viruses (i.e.
Rhinovirus, Adenovirus...) are not considered to be responsible of pneumonia.
5. Active cancer
6. Patient on a lung transplantation waiting list
7. Treatment with glucocorticoids > 1 mg/kg/d from more than 7 days in the last 15 days
8. Patient participating to another interventional clinical trial
9. Documented pregnancy or lactation
10. Patient under tutorship or curatorship
11. Patient deprived of liberty
12. Patient under court protection